Time to flush out the Blairites

It is time to reclaim Labour. John McDonnell, Chair of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs has decided to stand for Labour Party leadership, his statement in full:

It is becoming increasingly apparent that Tony Blair will announce his resignation as leader of the Labour party over the next 12 -18 months.

Some have argued that instead of an open democratic election for the leader of the party, there should be a smooth transition or virtual coronation of his successor.

This would deny party members the opportunity of openly debating the issues facing our party and the future direction of the country.

An election for the leader of the party will allow for a democratic debate on the future of Labour.

Therefore, following increasing demands from various sections of the movement, I have decided to declare myself as a candidate for the leadership of the Labour party as soon as the present incumbent retires.

To be clear this is not a so-called 'stalking horse' candidature but a serious challenge for the leadership of the party when a vacancy occurs.

I am standing to ensure that thousands of Labour party members and supporters have the chance to participate in deciding not only who should be the next leader of our party but more importantly what policies the party should be pursuing.

There are many that feel the party has lost its way. Many of the policies being pursued in government have broken up the broad coalition of support Labour has relied upon throughout its history to bring it to power.

New Labour has systematically alienated section after section of our supporters - teachers, health workers, students, pensioners, public service workers, trade unionists and people committed to the environment, civil liberties and peace. Spin and allegations of sleaze are causing decent people to lose trust in our party.

This is reflected in lost votes, lost elections, lost members and a Labour prime minister having to rely upon Conservative votes in parliament to force through legislation.

There are growing calls from across the party for change. We need to rebuild a progressive consensus, inspiring and giving people hope that another world is possible. We need those who have turned away from Labour to come back home.

For the first time in decades people no longer feel they have a political voice. This campaign is a challenge to the present political consensus.

I will now seek support from all sections of the movement. At next Saturday's conference of the Labour representation committee we will debate the policies needed by a real Labour government and the way in which we can reinvigorate democratic participation in the party.

From September this campaign will be travelling the country, convening meetings face to face with party members, supporters and the general public to discuss the issues facing us. We will be urging those thousands of Labour party members who have left the party to rejoin and those who are no longer active supporters to re-engage.

We are launching a campaign website today and we will use every possible means of communication and new technology to stimulate this debate and get our message across.

The campaign will be waged in an open, comradely and friendly manner based upon a debate on the policies not personalities.

Let the debate begin.

Ditch the red rose, bring back the red flag

Now is the time for us to reclaim our party. Those who have left the Labour Party in recent years and all other socialists should throw themselves headlong back into the Party and finally get the Blairites out and reverse the damage they've done.

Another world is possible.

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

8 comments

Comment from: Ibbeep [Visitor]
I was just wondering why they would just assign powers to another person when blair steps down. I know a little of british policies that doesnt seem to fit with it. Ahh well I'm ignorant in that realm. I think they should hold open debates. Sometimes parties do need to change. I wish our 2 party system was done away with here. Anyway. Look forward to seeing what will happen in England.
14th July 2006 @ 18:06
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
In the UK as we have no electable head of state, the Prime Minister is simply the leader of the party that was elected into power.

That leader can quite easily change through each term. The matter at hand though is an internal Labour Party election for a new leader.

It was widely assumed (in the media) that Brown (another Blairite) would be the only candidate to stand when Blair steps down, but those on the left have long seen this time as a good time to launch a leadership contest, not only to replace the leader but to give the Labour Party back to the working class where it belongs.
14th July 2006 @ 19:43
Comment from: Ibbeep [Visitor]
Ahh I see now. I feel much of the same must happen here in the US. The current political affair is...well not great. I as you know am a libertarian which generally means I have to vote on the conservative sides of most elections. I however do vote for the person I feel best qualified. SO in theory if Brown was to be defeated by Mcdonnell do you believe this would acctually change anything? I mean when leadership in the US. (speaker of the house and such) nothing really changes. Its just another politician pushing the agenda of the person whos pulling the strings.
14th July 2006 @ 21:03
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
This will result in huge changes. The end of Blairism and the 'New Labour' project and a return to core labour values.
14th July 2006 @ 21:21
Comment from: Ibbeep [Visitor]
Yes but the politicians are still politicians. They will vote on things that will keep them in power. (I personally advocate for all politicians to do something else and this be only thier kind of side job. Thats how it was when our nation was founded.)
My thinking is this suppose Mcdonnell does get elected. He is the vioce of the people for one term. Whos to say if he does what he believes is right will not alienate the people. In which case the party will throw him out to save face and hope to not loose any seats.
19th July 2006 @ 20:54
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Socialist policies will have the support of the majority because they're in the real material interests of the majority.
20th July 2006 @ 00:12
Comment from: Ibbeep [Visitor]
If it is a democratic nation if socialism is what is wanted it would have happened. Noone is stopping it from happening. The people who are elected are elected by the people. If they want socialism they should vote for socialism. Until the people do that I find it hard to believe they are for it.
21st July 2006 @ 16:59
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
As you are well aware, the people do support socialist policies.

They however due to false conciousness support "socialism" because socialism is a dirty word in bourgeois society for obvious reasons.

Seriously go out and do a survey ask people if they support individual points of a socialist program, they'll support them.

As the capitalists control the media, and the production of ideas within society people do not represent their interests as well as they would do if they weren't brainwashed.
21st July 2006 @ 20:57

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)