vista is not that great guys

Well, the last time I upgraded my computer was for Doom 3. This time it's for Supreme Commander. Which, for me, is less an actual reason to upgrade and more a signal that it's time to upgrade because my poor three-year-old computer can't handle new games anymore. Considering I'd expected the machine to last only two years, I think it went quite well.

So I ended up replacing just about everything. All that's left of the old machine is the power supply and the DVD drive. The upgrade includes a Core 2 Duo E6600, a Geforce 8800 GTS and 2GB of DDR2 RAM. Well, I say 2GB -- in fact it wouldn't boot up at all for a while, and refused even to get to POST until I tried removing one of the RAM sticks. Seems it's faulty, so I'll have to send it back to get replaced.

The thing doesn't care, though. It's been a long time since I've had a computer that burns through modern games without breaking a sweat, so excuse me if I sound a little overenthusiastic. It's damn quiet, too. My previous computer you could hear humming away in the neighbouring room; with headphones on this machine is scarcely audible.

Paul will be happy to hear that I got Vista along with it. Home Premium 64-bit. So far, aside from a bizarre networking problem (which was actually the fault of the motherboard), I'm quite happy with it. It was painless to install, and it certainly looks pretty. I must admit, though, that
________

ENORMOUS TIME GAP BETWEEN THE WRITING OF THIS POST
________

Okay so I have had this computer for quite a while. I just upgraded to 4GB of RAM, which is cool I guess, but I must admit Paul I am rather disappointed in this operating system of yours! Ignoring the general fanciness factor and the stuff you actually need Vista for (DX10), the system is basically useless. I barely ever boot into it anymore, because it is oh so slightly slower than XP for gaming and that is just not on! Plus, business like Stalker runs like shit on it for no satisfactory reason.

The only real use I have for Vista at this point is for Supreme Commander, and even then it's only useful because I've got the 64-bit edition. If I had the 64-bit XP, that'd probably be better. Because for whatever reason there's some kinda hard limit with how much RAM things can use in 32-bit Windows and I am like whaaat but that is just how it is

I am not saying Vista sucks, because it is certainly spiffy, it is just that UAC is mostly annoying and fucks up sometimes when you want to install things. Oh, and there's basically no reason to use it for things that don't explicitly need it. So I'm not giving Vista the finger, here, I'm just sort of telling it that maybe we should start seeing other people.

12 comments

Comment from: Tony [Visitor] Email
4 gigs of RAM, jesus save some fore the whales.

Don't you know there are RAM starved orphans in China. You make me sick.
28/06/07 @ 13:17
Comment from: arceihn [Member] · http://www.the-avatar.com
screw the whales I want to play big matches in SupCom
28/06/07 @ 13:22
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
UAC is important because it runs applications as standard user.

That means if Supreme Commander had an exploit in it, an attacker wouldn't get full access to your box, as SupCom runs as a standard user, under XP it would run with full rights to the whole box which is just silly.

If it really does bother you so much turn it off, but I can't recommend doing that.
28/06/07 @ 15:53
Comment from: arceihn [Member] · http://www.the-avatar.com
I have turned it off. Oh, I understand what UAC does, and honestly the constant pop-ups don't bother me. What drives me up the wall is the fact that with certain installers it seems to mess up and it just sits there for about five or ten minutes waiting for UAC to kick in and ask for admin permission. If it wasn't for that I'd gladly leave it enabled. I just don't feel like restarting every other time I try to install something.
28/06/07 @ 16:39
Comment from: Chill [Visitor] Email
Vista... not...good?

Paul... im dissolusioned...

I think the amount of RAM he has is his attempt to compensate fpr something else.
28/06/07 @ 18:30
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
Can't say I've experienced that.
29/06/07 @ 01:03
Comment from: Wester [Visitor]
I'm in agreeance because of inherent reasons. Vista sounds lucrative and all, but I won't be upgrading to it 'til there's reassurance that I can do everything I need to do on it without fail. However, if you thought nVidia's drivers for Vista were shitty, you'd have to try XP's. nVidia have accentuated Vista enough so that they've forgotten to write proper drivers for XP, and GeForce 8 series graphics cards and XP can't play a sizeable amount of games without FPS drops, lockups, and rendering artifacts... plus vague elements that'll show themselves sooner or later, like less noticeable issues. Not to be off-topic, though - Vista sounds nice, but I'm not in the mindset to dole out an overabundance of new issues with games that would have previously ran fine. And I honestly can't see much of a reason to go beyond 2GBs of RAM, even with Vista. 1GB sounds valid to me, but 2GB's for the next-generation would be a prudent minimum. Well, anyway, glad to see things are going okay for you in that regard, Ransom.
01/07/07 @ 21:29
Comment from: arceihn [Member] · http://www.the-avatar.com
I haven't had any problems with the Geforce 8 drivers in either OS.

Normally 2GB is plenty even with Vista, but not with Supreme Commander. Even in XP a machine with 2GB will generally crash after a couple of hours on one of the really big maps.
02/07/07 @ 09:29
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
If you're getting games falling over after they hit 2GB, PM me on the boards and I'll send you over a few things to extend the limit.
05/07/07 @ 22:32
Comment from: arceihn [Member] · http://www.the-avatar.com
There's a limit? I thought 64-bit did away with that nonsense.
06/07/07 @ 09:06
Comment from: Paul Smith [Member] · http://www.dasmirnov.net/
32-bit applications, unless they're compiled with the largeaddressaware flag, are limited to 2GB. With the largeaddressaware flag they've got up to 4GB.

Otherwise they need to be 64-bit applications.
06/07/07 @ 20:48
Comment from: Anthony [Visitor] Email
I was thinking about upgrading to vista because I was so pissed with Nvidia's drivers for XP. I heard the Vista ones are much better. BUT. Last time I checked Vista does not support SLI yet and I would hate to lose a video card.
03/08/07 @ 14:33

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)